<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yale Law Library - Reference Blog : shareholders</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/shareholders/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: shareholders</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>New paper at SSRN</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/04/15/new-paper-at-ssrn.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:138</guid><dc:creator>John Nann</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Professor Listokin recently &lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1112671"&gt;posted&lt;/a&gt; a new paper entitled &amp;quot;Does Shareholder Voting Maximize Stock Market Value.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Here is the abstract:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;font face="ARIAL, HELVETICA"&gt;This paper examines the relation between
shareholder voting and stock market value from a novel empirical
perspective. If voting maximizes value, then the outcome of close proxy
contests should not have a systematic effect on stock prices; price
setters will anticipate that voting aggregates information efficiently
and will build this expectation into the price of the stock before the
voting outcome is announced The paper shows, however, that close
dissident victories are associated with significant positive movements
in stock prices, while close management victories are associated with
negative stock price effects.
This suggests that voting outcomes favor management rather than
maximizing value, with important policy ramifications. Viewed from a
regression discontinuity (RD) design perspective, the study provides
unique evidence that dissident control of decision making causes
increases in stock value.&amp;quot;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=138" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Yale+Law+School/default.aspx">Yale Law School</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Scholarship/default.aspx">Scholarship</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/shareholders/default.aspx">shareholders</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/stock+market/default.aspx">stock market</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Yair+Listokin/default.aspx">Yair Listokin</category></item></channel></rss>