<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yale Law Library - Reference Blog : Rose-Ackerman</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Rose-Ackerman/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Rose-Ackerman</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>New Article</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/04/21/new-article.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:149</guid><dc:creator>John Nann</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;A new article by a member of our faculty has come to our attention.&amp;nbsp; Here is the opening: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In December 2006, the British Serious Fraud Office (SFO) closed an investigation into a case that has become a vexing test for the emerging international anti-corruption regime. The centerpiece of this regime is the Anti-Bribery Convention negotiated under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The Convention—to which Britain is a party—requires the State Parties to outlaw overseas bribery. In closing the investigation into corruption involving a large defense procurement contract (dubbed Al Yamamah or “the dove”), the SFO and the Attorney General cited national security concerns.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font face="Verdana"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;Susan Rose-Ackerman and Benjamin
Billa, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Verdana"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;"&gt;Treaties and National Security, 40 N.Y.U. J. Int&amp;#39;l L. &amp;amp;
Pol. 437 (2008).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The NYU Journal of Law and Politics has &lt;a href="http://www3.law.nyu.edu/journals/jilp/issues/40/NYI202.pdf"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt; (the whole article :-)).&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=149" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Treaties/default.aspx">Treaties</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/international+law/default.aspx">international law</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Rose-Ackerman/default.aspx">Rose-Ackerman</category></item></channel></rss>