<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yale Law Library - Reference Blog : Ethics</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Ethics</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>The Law Library of Congress comes through again!</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/04/15/the-law-library-of-congress-comes-through-again.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:137</guid><dc:creator>John Nann</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the great early American examples of a lawyer ensuring that unpopular defendants got a fair trial, even defendants with whom the lawyer may have disagreed took place in Boston in 1770.&amp;nbsp; The lawyer was John Adams and the defendants were the British soldiers who were accused of murder from their involvement in the Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Law Library of Congress has &lt;a href="http://www.loc.gov/law/help/rare-books/john_adams.html"&gt;posted&lt;/a&gt; copies of three published accounts of the records and transcripts of the trial, a history of the Massacre and trial, and a character sketch of Adams that includes his Speech on the Boston Massacre.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great reading on one of the great ethical responses of the revolutionary bar!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=137" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx">Ethics</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/History/default.aspx">History</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/library+of+congress/default.aspx">library of congress</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/John+Adams/default.aspx">John Adams</category></item><item><title>Lawyer and Client Sanctioned $29K for Conduct During a Deposition</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/03/07/53.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:53</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;U.S. District Judge Eduardo Robreno of Philadelphia has tallied the
number of times Aaron Wider, the CEO of HTFC, dropped the F-word or a
variant of it in a deposition — it was 73 times — and calculated the
more than $29,000 sanction he and his lawyer Joseph R. Ziccardi should
pay. In his &lt;a href="http://www.websupp.com/data/EDPA/2:06-cv-05291-28-EDPA.pdf"&gt;44-page opinion&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;i&gt;GMAC Bank v. HTFC Corp.,&lt;/i&gt; U.S.
District Judge Eduardo C. Robreno found that Ziccardi was also to blame
for his client&amp;#39;s hostile conduct because he failed to stop his client&amp;#39;s
tirades and persuade him to answer questions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(via &lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1204631594910"&gt;The Legal Intelligencer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1204631594910"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Ethics/default.aspx">Ethics</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Practice/default.aspx">Practice</category></item></channel></rss>