<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yale Law Library - Reference Blog : Courts</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Courts/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Courts</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>So, which State Supreme Court is the most convincing?</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/03/11/70.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:70</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;A recent study of citations to state supreme court opinions reveals
that the California Supreme Court is most often followed by sister
state supreme court.&amp;nbsp; The New York Times &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/us/11bar.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=us&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; describing the study includes the following:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In the 65 years ending in 2005, more than 24,000 state high court cases have been followed at least once. &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/national/usstatesterritoriesandpossessions/california/index.html?inline=nyt-geo" title="More news and information about California."&gt;California&lt;/a&gt;
leads with 1,260 decisions. Washington is next, with 942, and Colorado
is third, with 848. New York comes in 10th and is only about half as
influential as California, with 627 followed cases.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study, published in the UC Davis Law Review is available &lt;a href="http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/41-2_Dear.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=70" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Case+Law/default.aspx">Case Law</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Courts/default.aspx">Courts</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Citation+Studies/default.aspx">Citation Studies</category></item><item><title>A Supreme Court for the UK nears</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/02/13/66.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:66</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>
&lt;p&gt;As a Supreme Court for the UK approaches, appellate judging is in the news. From &lt;a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/columnists/david_pannick/article3349334.ece"&gt;The Times&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;How many law lords does it take to decide a case? Normally, the
answer is five. But last week and this, nine members of the Appellate
Committee of the House of Lords are hearing two important cases. When
the new Supreme Court opens its doors in October 2009, seven or nine
justices should hear every case. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are 12 law lords, if you count (and no one has done so for a
long time) Lord Saville of Newdigate, who has spent the past ten years
out of the office chairing the inquiry into the 1972 Bloody Sunday
shootings in Northern Ireland and who is unlikely ever to return to
judicial work even when (if ?) he finishes his report. But the
remaining 11 law lords never squeeze around the same table to hear
appeals. Almost all appeals are heard by five law lords. Exceptionally,
nine of them listened to argument last week in a case brought by the
President of the republic of Equatorial Guinea against defendants who
he alleges conspired in England and elsewhere to overthrow the
Government and seize power by means of a coup which, in the event,
failed. And nine judges are this week hearing a case brought against
the Prime Minister by two mothers whose sons were servicemen killed on
duty in Iraq and who contend that there should be an inquiry into
whether the invasion was in breach of international law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=66" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/UK/default.aspx">UK</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Courts/default.aspx">Courts</category></item></channel></rss>