<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yale Law Library - Reference Blog : Bill of Rights</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Bill+of+Rights/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Bill of Rights</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 SP1 (Build: 30415.43)</generator><item><title>The English Bill of Rights - a bill of responsibilities!</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/02/14/62.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:62</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This is really interesting. The proposed new British Bill of Rights looks
increasingly like a bill of responsibilities.&amp;nbsp; Responsibilities that
are enforceable in court!
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More from &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/feb/14/jackstraw.constitution?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=uknews"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new British bill of rights and duties may include duties of
behaviour between fellow citizens that are enforceable by judges, the
justice secretary Jack Straw indicated yesterday. Straw, also lord
chancellor, is planning a British bill of rights to complement the
European convention on human rights. The exercise is separate from a
possible 20-year plan to introduce a potential British written
constitution. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Straw made his remarks in a speech at George Washington University,
Washington DC, where he also indicated that a written constitution was
20 years away. He said he was looking at a US-style sentencing
commission that might take into account the size of the prison
population in making broad decisions on sentencing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=62" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/UK/default.aspx">UK</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Bill+of+Rights/default.aspx">Bill of Rights</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Constitution/default.aspx">Constitution</category></item><item><title>The Guardian gets into the constitutional conversation</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/02/14/63.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:63</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The constitutional conversation is getting interesting.&amp;nbsp; Here &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/feb/14/constitution.jackstraw?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=politics"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt; gets in its two cents (is that pence?):
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Evolution not revolution is the way for constitutions to develop -
except, perhaps, at times in history when a real revolution is under
way. That was the message of justice secretary Jack Straw yesterday, as
he spoke to a Washington audience. The tumultuous circumstances of
American independence allowed the founding fathers to build up enduring
rules from first principles; in more ordinary times a constitution
written on a blank sheet will provide only a paper barrier against the
abuse of power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=63" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/UK/default.aspx">UK</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Bill+of+Rights/default.aspx">Bill of Rights</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Constitution/default.aspx">Constitution</category></item><item><title>Fall-Out from Straw's constitutional comments</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/02/14/64.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:64</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;That didn&amp;#39;t take long. Responses to Straw&amp;#39;s comments are coming fast
and furious. This will be interesting to watch. Here is an article in
&lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article3365836.ece"&gt;The Times&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;What a difference a few hours make. In the morning, Jack Straw’s
heavily qualified hints about working towards a written constitution
were welcomed by Unlock Democracy, a leading reform group. Then, in the
afternoon, Mr Straw’s full speech, entitled “Modernising the Magna
Carta”, received a more hostile response: “what a load of cobblers,” as
the OurKingdom website put it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=64" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/UK/default.aspx">UK</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Bill+of+Rights/default.aspx">Bill of Rights</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Constitution/default.aspx">Constitution</category></item><item><title>Jack Straw discusses a written constitution for Britain</title><link>http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/2008/02/13/65.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3dba5dbf-cc88-412d-a5e1-dc96318a2d17:65</guid><dc:creator>Tom Boone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Jack Straw discussed the
future of the British constitution and bill of rights and
responsibilities on BBC yesterday.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/feb/13/constitution"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt; picks it up:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Britain is unlikely to have a full written constitution for at
least 10 or 20 years, the justice secretary, Jack Straw, said today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He confirmed that he is drawing up plans for a draft bill of rights
and responsibilities, which would set down in one document the rights
that citizens have, and also their civic duties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But he stressed that this would not be the same as a new written constitution, such as America&amp;#39;s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;



    
    &lt;img src="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/aggbug.aspx?PostID=65" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/UK/default.aspx">UK</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Bill+of+Rights/default.aspx">Bill of Rights</category><category domain="http://blogs.law.yale.edu/blogs/reference/archive/tags/Constitution/default.aspx">Constitution</category></item></channel></rss>